DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-040
TIS 10 yrs, 11 months, 18 days
Policy Implications None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a serious offense. The applicant’s
complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.
The applicant made false official statements to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS). Additionally, the
applicant agreed to separate from the service in lieu of Court-Martial proceedings and punishment. This is
acknowledged in writing by the applicant.
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
The applicant was given due process and spoke with an attorney on accepting a more favorable character of
service in lieu of a Summary Court-Martial punishment and a subsequent separation. The applicant received an
Honorable discharge which is uncommon for someone facing Court-Martial offenses.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 023
1.B.20, KFS, Triable by Court Martial, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED BY DRB CORRECTIONS | TIS Policy Implications 4 yrs, 9 months, 16 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Triable By Court Martial due to be being an accessory in theft (after the fact), disobeying a direct order, and procuring a prostitute. The applicant requested to be separated ‘For the Good of the Service’ in lieu of the Court martial (CM) proceedings and punishment. Therefore, the board by a majority vote...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 053
The applicant voluntarily requested a separation for ‘The Good of the Service’ vice in lieu of the Court Martial proceedings and punishment. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The DD-214 was issued incorrectly with Article 1.A.1.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 027
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-027 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, 12.A.7, BNC, Unacceptable Conduct, NA RELIEF REQUESTED |} Honorable; Narrative Reason to ‘Completion of Required Active Service’ BY DRB CORRECTIONS | TIS | Policy Implications 17 yrs, 3 months, 14 days | None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Applicant resigned their commission with an under honorable conditions character of service, and a narrative reason for separation of unacceptable conduct. In the...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 039
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-039 TIS 2 yrs, 1 month, 26 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged due to a voluntary request as part of a pretrial agreement for separation in lieu of Special Court Martial proceedings. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board does note that the DD-214 incorrectly cites the Separation Authority as COMDTINST M1000.6A, Art 12.B.1.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 017
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-017 Under Honorable Conditions, |-B-17 COMDTINST M1000.4 [-B-17 COMDTINST M1000.4 Honorable None None TIS Policy Implications 4 yrs, | month, 8 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2012. The actions that led to the Discharge included Adultery with an officer’s wife, sending racially offensive texts to the other parent of their children (also a CG mbr), attempting to...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 037
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-037 Other Than Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6, Art 12-B-21, KFS, For the good of the Service, RE4 Honorable None None TIS 7 yrs, 3 months, 23 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for For The Good Of The Service in the Spring of 2006. In early 2006, the applicant was facing Court Martial charges for failing to provide a valid urine sample during a unit urinalysis. The Board finds no issues with propriety...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 006
The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record, Summary Courts-Martial, Pretrial Agreement, and Separation Package were available for the Board to review. The applicant (and attorney brief) states that the victims were reciprocal in the physical contact, text messages, and sexual nature initiated by the applicant. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity on the merits of this case.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 005
The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. tn reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (to include evidence submitted by the Applicant) to rebut the presumption.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 054
The applicant received punishment that was no higher than a Summary Court Martial with one guilty plea on the two charges that occurred. The applicant’s committed offense warrants no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service. The General discharge was issued correctly at the time of separation in 2005.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 064
The applicant is asking that the board look at the entirety of service time with regard to the Character of Service that was issued. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Propriety: Discharge was proper.